This
paper examines the impact of public financial management (PFM) reforms on
executing Afghanistan’s development budget. The key reforms analyzed include
the AFMIS, TSA, MTBF, PBB, Public Investment Management Framework (PIMF),
budget decentralization, centralized reporting systems, development budget
framework, procurement process reforms, and cash management practices reform.
The study is grounded in principal-agent, New Public Management (NPM), and
institutional theory and employed an ex post facto descriptive, mixed-methods
research design. The findings reveal a statistically positive relationship
between PFM reforms and the development budget execution rate. Nonetheless,
major challenges such as political and security instability, limited
institutional capacity, and corruption hinder progress. Low execution rates of
the development budget are further affected by line ministries' limited
absorption capacity, delayed donor disbursements, and overly optimistic budget
projections.
Please enter the email address corresponding to this article submission to download your certificate.
