The purpose of this study was to analyze the Indonesia’s implementation of the physical construction whether it has been running optimally or not; factors that led to the need for reconstruction of the law on the implementation of physical construction services to improve the quality of public services; construction and reconstruction of the law enforcement of physical development in order to improve the quality of public services that can be applied fairly. The results of this study shows that the physical construction can not run optimally. In terms of substance, except for the aspects of contract law, Law No. 18 of 1999 on Construction Services gives a fairly complete set of procurement of construction services. In connection with the procurement of construction services, Presidential Decree No. 54 the year 2010 has used the term "construction", the use of this term is different from that used in the Presidential Decree No. 80 of 2003. In terms of terminology, the term chartering services is not appropriate because since the enactment of Law No. 18 In 1999 the term is not used anymore. This type of contract with the object of construction project is the construction work contract and not a contract of chartering building as commonly used before the advent of this law. In order to eliminate inefficiencies, monopoly, and the practices of corruption, collusion and nepotism in the activities of construction services, it must be formulated a principle of openness in greater detail in the articles of arrangement expected to create orderly organization of the activities of construction services that gives availability of a fair chance or opportunity for the public to participate in the implementation of construction work, fair competition among service providers, equality position between service users with the service providers in the rights and obligations, as well as improving legislation compliance.