Background: - In the competitive world of today, many athletes and coaches seek sports psychology and psychological training programs to learn and to manage competitive stress, control concentration, improve confidence and increase communication skills and team harmony. Alderman (1974) defines personality as “integration or merging of all the post of one’s psychological life the way one thinks, feel, acts and behaves”. Intelligence includes concern for the broader social context in which intelligent behavior occurs. It may be defined as the subjective feeling of contentment, happiness and satisfaction with a sense of achievement, utility and no distress. The purpose of the study was to find out the relationship between personality and intelligence with subjective well beings of handball male players. rnMaterials and methods: - A total number of subjects for the present study were 60 male players, who had participated at least at inter-collegiate level of k.u.k. in the age group of 17 to 24. The tools used for the study were Eysenck Personality Inventory (E.P.I.) by H. J. Eysenck and S.B.G. Eysenck, Hindi version, B. S. Gupta. General Mental Ability Test developed by S. Jaltoa.PGI General well-being measured by Dr. Santosh K. Verma and Miss Amita Verma. For the present study mean value, standard deviation and t-test were applied to analyze the data and also different steps in t-test were used. rnResults and discussions: - After the interpretation of data there was found a significant difference between high well-being groups and low well-being groups of Handball players on the basis of N factor and E factor. No significant difference was found between high well-being groups and low well-being groups of Handball players on the basis of intelligence. rnConclusion: - On the basis of results of the present study, we concluded that low well-being groups had more neurotic than the high well-being groups on the basis of personality N-factor of Handball players. High well-being groups were more extroverts than the low well-being groups on the basis of E-factor of Handball players. High well-being groups had slightly better intelligence than the low well-being groups on the basis of Handball players.signs.